Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://idr.l1.nitk.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/10665
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNarayana, M.S.-
dc.contributor.authorArthanareeswaran, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSankar, Rao, C.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T08:22:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-31T08:22:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAsia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, Vol., , pp.-en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://idr.nitk.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/10665-
dc.description.abstractThis paper deals with Aspen Plus and Aspen Dynamics of the middle vessel batch distillation for the separation of mixtures of ethanol/propanol/butanol. Two configurations of middle vessel batch distillation have been considered, namely, the conventional middle vessel batch distillation (Configuration 1) and the modified middle vessel batch distillation column (Configuration 2). Steady-state simulations have been performed in Aspen Plus and exported to Aspen Dynamics for dynamic simulation. Dynamic studies show that Configuration 1 requires less time than Configuration 2 to obtain more than 95% of the compositions of ethanol, propanol, and butanol. The efficacy of the two controllers is assessed by the performance indices of integral of square error, integral of absolute error, and integral of time-weighted absolute error. Configuration 1 is found to have better performance than Configuration 2. 2020 Curtin University and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.titleDynamic performance comparison of two configurations of middle vessel batch distillation column for the separation of ethanol/propanol/butanol mixtureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:1. Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2 Dynamic performance comparison.pdf5.72 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.