Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://idr.l1.nitk.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/15109
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVivek K.V.
dc.contributor.authorSheta M.A.
dc.contributor.authorGumtapure V.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-05T10:16:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-05T10:16:27Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationProceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Green Technology, ICISGT 2019 , Vol. , , p. 67 - 71en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICISGT44072.2019.00030
dc.identifier.urihttp://idr.nitk.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/15109-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents comparative study between Stanley, LQR (Linear Quadratic Regulator) and MPC (Model Predictive Controller) controllers for path tracking application, which is a level 4 automation feature under ADAS/AD (Advanced Driver Assistance System/Autonomous Driving). The accuracy associated with all the controllers are compared by making the vehicle model run in a prescribed environment. The initial designs are done in MATLAB environment and later they are interfaced with IPG CarMaker vehicle simulation tool for fine tuning. Stanley controller is more of an intuitive steering control law where as LQR and MPC are more advanced optimal controllers. The control actions are calculated by optimising the states of the model. Kinematic vehicle model is used with states as errors and a comparator design is made to find the deviation of the vehicle from the prescribed path. The paper gives a detailed idea about the controllers regarding its use, advantages and limitations in this application. © 2019 IEEE.en_US
dc.titleA comparative study of stanley, lqr and mpc controllers for path tracking application (adas/ad)en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:2. Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.